Optimization of Urine Storage with the Addition of 40% Formalin at a Temperature of 2–8°C: Stability of the Amount and Morphology of Sediment Elements

Authors

  • Rusmini Rusmini Medical Laboratory Technology, Poltekkes Kemenkes Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ahyat Ridhoni Medical Laboratory Technology, Poltekkes Kemenkes Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35916/thmr.v8i1.144

Keywords:

Cell morphology, formalin preservation, storage temperature (2–8°C), urine analysis, urine sediment

Abstract

Urine sediment examination is an essential component of urinalysis used to detect various renal and urinary tract disorders. However, sediment elements in urine are prone to rapid degradation, requiring a preservation method that maintains both their quantity and morphology. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of urine storage with 40% formalin at 2–8°C for 3, 6, and 9 days on the mean count and morphology of erythrocytes, leukocytes, squamous epithelial cells, and transitional epithelial cells. A quasi-experimental design with a pretest–posttest control-group approach was used with six urine samples selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed descriptively, followed by repeated measures ANOVA and pairwise comparison tests. The results showed that erythrocytes (p=0.185) and transitional epithelial cells (p=0.775) did not exhibit significant differences across storage durations. Squamous epithelial cells showed significant differences in the ANOVA test (p=0.010), but the pairwise comparison did not yield consistent results. Leukocytes demonstrated significant differences in the ANOVA test (p=0.000), with a notable decrease observed on days 6 and 9 (p<0.05). Despite this, the morphology of all sediment elements remained well-preserved (score 2), with clearly distinguishable cell structures observable up to day 9. These findings suggest that urine preservation using 40% formalin at 2–8°C can maintain the count of erythrocytes, squamous epithelial cells, and transitional epithelial cells, while preserving the morphology of all four sediment elements for up to nine days. This has important implications for research requiring medium-term sample storage. The developed protocol can serve as a reference for standardizing urine preservation procedures.

References

Gandasoebrata R. Penuntun laboratorium klinis. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat; 2013.

Niawaty P, Rikarni, Yulia D. Uji kesesuaian hasil pemeriksaan sedimen urine metode Shih-Yung pada volume urine 10 mL dan 5 mL. J Kesehat Andalas. 2021;10(2):88-93.

Naid T, Mangerangi F, Almahdaly H. Pengaruh penundaan waktu terhadap hasil urinalisis sedimen urin. As-Syifaa. 2014;6(2):212-219.

Subhan, Kristinawati E, Getas IW. Perbedaan jumlah kalsium oksalat urine metode sedimentasi antara kelompok vegetarian dengan non-vegetarian. J Analis Medika Bio Sains. 2019;6(2):105-111.

Susanti H, Yoavita, Rudianto, Puspitawati I. Pemeriksaan laboratorium urine rutin. Jakarta: Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory Specialists; 2022.

Delanghe J, Speeckaert M. Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(1):89-104.

Apriyani RK, Melani MS. Pemeriksaan jumlah leukosit pada pasien hiperglikemia menggunakan sampel urine dengan berbagai waktu penyimpanan. J Kesehat Tambusai. 2023;4(3):3238-3245.

Widiastuti UT. Pengaruh waktu tunda terhadap hasil sedimen urine menggunakan pengawet formaldehida [skripsi]. Semarang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang; 2018.

Sari DAI. Differences in urine with sediment results preserving formalin and toluene. J Lab Khatulistiwa. 2023;6(2):212-219.

Maharani DMS, Inayat N, Wiwin M. Jenis dan jumlah sedimen urine menggunakan variasi konsentrasi pengawet formalin. J Kesehat. 2017;11(2).

Japanese Association of Medical Technologists, Editorial Committee of the Special Issue: Urinary Sediment. Aims of the guidelines on urinary sediment examination procedures proposed by the Japanese Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (JCCLS). J Jpn Assoc Med Technol. 2017;66:9-17.

Karakoyun I, Arslan FD, Baysoy A, Aksit M, Colak A, Isb?len Basok B. The effects of chlorhexidine-based preservative tubes on routine urinalysis stability. Int J Med Biochem. 2020;3(3):155-160.

Ribeiro KCB, Serafion BRL, Nolasco EL, et al. Urine storage under refrigeration preserves the sample in chemical, cellularity, and bacteriuria analysis of ACS. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2013;49(6):415-422.

Johnson R, Patel A, Chen Y. Simple urine storage protocol for extracellular vesicle proteomics. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2021;15(5):e210002.

Salazar-García S, Lares-Villaseñor E, Bárcenas-Morales A, Vargas-Morales JM. Impact of chemical preservative in urine samples. EJIFCC. 2020;31(1):56-64.

Downloads

Published

09-03-2026

How to Cite

Rusmini, R., & Ridhoni, M. A. (2026). Optimization of Urine Storage with the Addition of 40% Formalin at a Temperature of 2–8°C: Stability of the Amount and Morphology of Sediment Elements. Tropical Health and Medical Research, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35916/thmr.v8i1.144